Study 1: A high qSOFA score is not significantly associated with mortality, as qSOFA-negative patients were found to have higher rates of immunosuppression and hematologic malignancies, diseases that may alter the immune response and the validity of the qSOFA score. As a result, qSOFA-negative patients had a similar mortality rate (23.1%) to qSOFA-positive patients (30.2%). [1]
Study 2: Another study notes that qSOFA scores of 0, 1, and 2 were not associated with increased ICU mortality rates (odds ratio [OR] of 1.24), while patients with a qSOFA score of 3 had a significantly higher mortality (OR of 2.82). HIV-positive septic patients with a positive qSOFA score had an even higher mortality (OR of 1.33). For patients without infection, both a score of 2 and a score of 3 were significantly associated with an increased odds of in-ICU mortality (OR 6.26). It is noteworthy that even in patients without infection and with a high qSOFA score, mortality was still lower than for septic patients. These results suggest that the qSOFA score may provide prognostic data for non-septic ICU patients as well. [2]
Meta-analysis:
A 2017 meta-analysis showed that qSOFA doesn't have a high enough sensitivity for diagnosing organ dysfunction. It was neither sensitive enough to provide early risk assessment to help decide if patients would need transfer to the ICU. [3], [6] In one analyzed study, qSOFA and SIRS provided similar discrimination for organ dysfunction. [4]
The authors note that one downside of the Sepsis-3 definition is the poor sensitivity of the qSOFA scoring system, which makes it not very useful for early sepsis detection. The authors concluded that the SOFA score was superior in predicting hospital mortality, and the SIRS criteria had higher prognostic accuracy for in-hospital mortality than the qSOFA score. However, results from another study found that qSOFA had the greatest prognostic accuracy among the other scores. [5], [6]
In conclusion, while the SOFA and qSOFA scores have the ability to identify patients who may have poor outcomes, they lack sensitivity for identifying sepsis patients, and additional laboratory results (such as the new presepsin marker, CRP, and other acute phase reactants) and clinical data may be required.
The SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and qSOFA (Quick Sequential or Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment) scores are widely used in critical care medicine to assess the severity of organ dysfunction in patients with suspected or confirmed infections. These scores help clinicians identify patients who may be at a higher risk of developing sepsis or septic shock.
Both the SOFA and qSOFA scores are valuable tools in assessing the severity of organ dysfunction and identifying patients who require closer monitoring or more aggressive interventions in the context of infections. However, it's important to note that these scores should be used in conjunction with clinical judgment, and further evaluation may be necessary to confirm the presence of sepsis or septic shock.
Sepsis Scoring Calculator, SOFA score, qSOFA score, Organ dysfunction assessment, Infection, Interactive tool, Calculator, Parameters, Clinical implications, Risk assessment, Sepsis, Septic shock, Patient outcomes, Hands-on experience, Informed decisions, Care provisionSepsis Scoring Calculator: Assessing Organ Dysfunction with the qSOFA (quick SOFA) ScoreqSOFA Score0000